\n
Anyone can make great videos with VEED (myself included 😏)
\nForget complex software, expensive editors & endless feedback loops. Go from raw footage to beautifully edited videos in minutes.
\nCreate, collaborate and share great videos easily. Create pro-looking videos, effortlessly.
\nBetter videos faster. Start for free. No credit card required.
\nAND 'Fine Lines' readers get 50% off their first 3 months subscription!
\n\n
\nHere are five contrarian leadership approaches that I've witnessed first-hand as being effective either for myself or for the sports leaders I coach. At first glance you might not agree with them. That's fine. But just be open-minded. Read them, consider them and pick out some elements that you think might work for you.
\nA high-performance director I worked with faced a team in crisis. Every expert told him to increase coaching, add more video sessions, and extend practice time.
\nHe did the opposite. He cut sessions by 30%, simplified messaging to three key points, and created more recovery time.
\nThe result? Performance improved within two weeks. Players reported feeling \"like they could think clearly again.\"
\nIn crisis, less input often beats more. Information overload creates mental fatigue that masquerades as physical fatigue.
\nApplication: Identify one area where you're pushing harder for results. Scale back by 25% for one week as an experiment. Replace that time with targeted recovery, reflection or something that runs a little counterintuitive to your present practice.
\nA Scottish Premier League coach I worked with noticed his polite, conflict-free culture was producing mediocre results. Everything was, well, 'nice'.
\nInstead of pushing for more harmony, he took the opposite approach. He paired his most opposing personalities on projects, rewarded constructive disagreement, and openly challenged 'sacred' team traditions & rituals.
\nAdmittedly, the first month was chaos. But in month two his team began having the honest conversations they'd avoided for years. By season's end, they'd moved up positions in the standings over and above expectations.
\nI saw first-hand that artificial harmony kills innovation. Managed conflict and injecting some tension can, counter to what we'd be normally led to believe, break entrenched thinking patterns that hold teams back.
\nApplication: Identify your team's \"undiscussable\" topic - the elephant in the room. Put it on the agenda; but with clear debate & conversation rules. Persist through the tension and don't end the meeting until real perspectives emerge. Watch what happens when people finally say what they actually think. (A good reference point is from years back in Irish Rugby when one of the younger squad players surfaced the underlying tensions between Munster and Leinster players and how he believed this was stifling the national team. Players from that team still reference that moment.)
\nIn my own career I with noticed with one team that the players responded less and less to motivational tactics. Instead of finding new ways to inspire them, I ran into the bullets and did something radical. I began questioning, in a positive tone, whether they were genuinely top players or just pretending to be.
\nI removed motivational quotes from changing rooms and the gym. I stopped pre-match pep talks. And I started asking uncomfortable questions like: \"If today's performance was all I knew about you, what would I think about your potential?\"
\nIt was tough going. Initially, players were quite furious. Then something shifted. They stopped seeking external motivation and found something more powerful - we began to explore our 'Cause' a little bit more and from that grew the desire to prove their own identity to themselves.
\nI learned that constant motivation creates dependency.
\nStrategic unsettling forces self-directed drive.
\nApplication: For one week, stop all motivational communication. No pep talks. No inspiring messages. Instead, ask challenging questions about identity and standards. \"Is this who we really are?\" \"Would a championship team accept this standard?\" Then stay silent. Stay silent for as long as it takes and let the discomfort begin to do its work.
\nYou're told to constantly seek feedback and adapt our approach. I even do it sometimes in this newsletter!
\nBut, I've seen this create leaders who react to opinions rather than driving toward clear vision. We must remember that the greatest innovations were initially met with negative feedback.
\nApplication: Select one strategic initiative you deeply believe in. Announce you're suspending all feedback on it for 90 days to protect its development. Push forward regardless of opinion. After 90 days, evaluate results, not reactions.
\nCase in point. When Jurgen Klopp implemented his pressing system at Liverpool, critics called it unsustainable. Injuries went through the roof owing to a dramatic increase in training and playing intensity. Had he listened to online and media experts he would have modified the approach based on early, knee-jerk feedback. And very likely he would never have created the winning machine that emerged.
\nMost teams and clubs hide failures, creating the illusion of constant success. They crave external approval.
\nThis prevents learning, increases impostor syndrome, and builds cultures of fear and image management.
\nApplication: Create a \"Failure Wall\". It's simply a place where players post their biggest mistakes and what they learned (simple Post-It notes do the trick or an online app or group chat. Regardless, make it easy to engage with).
\nYou go first. Be brutally honest. As a leader, the more graphic your failure admission should be. Make hiding failure more painful than admitting it. This is simple, but far from easy. Go with it though.
\nA UK Basketball team I engaged with implemented a version of this practice. Players who made mistakes had to explain them to the entire team - but in a culture where psychological safety was demanded and guaranteed. Yes, it injected tension and discomfort. But that was the players pushing the edges of their comfort zone. Over time these genuine admissions became a badge of courage, not shame.
\nI would be remiss of me not to shine a light on this.
\nBeing contrarian isn't free. It costs something.
\nYou'll face resistance. You might look foolish if you're wrong. You'll need to explain your thinking more than others do.
\nBut consider the alternative. Being a dead fish that is carried by the tide?
\nThe path to mediocrity is paved with popular wisdom.
\nStart small. Pick one area where conventional wisdom just doesn't feel right to you.
\nAgain, ask: \"What if the opposite approach is actually correct?\"
\nThen run a small, low-risk test of that opposite approach.
\nDocument what happens. Learn from it. Adjust.
\nThen run a slightly bigger test.
\nThe contrarian path isn't about being difficult or different for its own sake. It's about finding hidden truths that others miss because they're too busy agreeing with each other.
\nWhat conventional wisdom could you challenge this week?
\nInterested in more leadership strategies, insights & frameworks to help you perform better?
\nHave you had a look at my online Leadership Course where we focused on 6 proven principles that will help you stand out as a leader - you can get more detail here and use 'Leader33' discount code for your exclusive community discount.
\nAlso check out my YouTube channel: Paul Clarke - The Leaders Coach.
\nLet’s connect: On X and Linkedin
\n\n | \nScience-Backed Leadership Tips You’ll Actually UsePractical Perspectives: A Monthly Newsletter by Angela Justice, PhDSurprisingly simple, science-backed leadership strategies to help you win at work. Your ultimate field guide to success, crafted by an award-winning expert. \nSubscribe \n | \n
Worth noting that this type of work often commences with a level of excitement and a bias to jump straight to a solution. That’s rarely rewarding. Start slow. take your time and start by asking questions and considering all alternatives. From the outset, always assume that there is more to learn. It's rarely unrewarding to ask the most basic question of all: Why?
\n
\n\n | \n Thank you for being part of the Leaders Coach community. \nThe work on how to lead better is something you have to do alone. \nBut you don't have to do it on your own. \nOnward and Upward, \nPaul Clarke \n | \n
\n | Beechmount Vale, Navan, Meath C15 | \n\n |
|
Leadership insights, advice & support every Friday; giving you the proven strategies & frameworks to be the best leader you can be. Join the 000s in our community. It's time to Step Up, Stand Out and Stay Ahead.
April 4, 2025 Hi Reader You've read the books. Attended the courses. Maybe did a post-grad. You follow the experts. Do site visits. Yet something's missing. The gap between average, good and great leaders often isn't found in what everyone talks about. It hides in the wide open – in principles so fundamental they're nearly invisible. I've spent years studying sports leaders who consistently outperform their peers. The difference, largely, isn't talent or resources. It's their unconscious...
March 28, 2025 Hi Reader I think we've all seen it happen. You might well have felt (of feel?) it yourself. A talented head-coach with a decade of experience still makes the same mistakes they made in year one. A sports director who claims "extensive experience" but shows little growth in actual wisdom. The shocking and sad truth? Many sports leaders don't have ten years of experience. They have one year, repeated ten times. This isn't about intelligence, aptitude or work ethic. It's about...
March 14, 2025 Hi Reader Ever notice how you can often feel stuck? But that the men and women you consider to be successful sports leaders seem to see things others miss? In my own career and in working with head coaches, managers & other leaders within sports teams/clubs I’ve seen that it's rarely about having better answers. It's about asking better questions. The gap between the chasing pack and the good & great often hides in plain sight - in the questions you never thought to ask. The...